Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data: quantitative applications in the social sciences. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council for Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Asghar, A., Wiles, J. R., & Alters, B. (2007). Canadian pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptions of biological evolution and evolution education. McGill Journal of Education, 42(2), 189–210.
Banilower, E. R., Heck, D. J., & Weiss, I. R. (2007). Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the national science foundation’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Bao, L. (2006). Theoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations. American Journal of Physics,
Battisti, B. T., Hanegan, N., Sudweeks, R., & Cates, R. (2010). Using item response theory to conduct a distracter analysis on conceptual inventory of natural selection. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,
Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: a model from science education. London/Washington: Falmer Press.
Berkman, M. B., & Plutzer, E. (2011). Defeating creationism in the courtroom, but not in the classroom. Science,
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education,
Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: college students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education,
Cobern, W. W. (1996). Constructivism and non-western science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 18(3), 295–310.
Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. J. (1998). The golem at large: what you should know about science (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, B. A., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers’ ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry-based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Custers, E. J. F. M. (2010). Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study. Advances in Health Sciences Education,
Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Desantis, L. R. G. (2009). Teaching evolution through inquiry-based lessons of uncontroversial science. The American Biology Teacher,
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher,
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: research into children’s ideas. New York: Routledge.
Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1966). U¨ber das Geda¨chnis. Untersuchungen zur Experimentellen Psychologie. Nachdruk der Ausgabe Leipzig 1885. Amsterdam, Netherlands: E. J. Bonset. [English text available at http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Ebbinghaus/index.htm].
El-Hani, C. N., & Mortimer, E. F. (2007). Multicultural education, pragmatism, and the goals of science teaching. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(3), 657–702.
Firenze, R. F. (1997). The identification, assessment, and amelioration of perceived and actual barriers to teachers’ incorporation of evolutionary theory as a central theme in life science classes through a two-week institute and follow-up studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Binghamton University State University of New York, Vestal, NY.
Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: a follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal,
Futuyma, D. (2009). Evolution (2nd ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: essential concepts and common alternative conceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach,
Griffith, J. A., & Brem, S. K. (2004). Teaching evolutionary biology: Pressures, stress, and coping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 791–809.
Großschedl, J., Konnemann, C., & Basel, N. (2014). Pre-service biology teachers’ acceptance of evolutionary theory and their preference for its teaching. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7(1), 1–16.
Ha, M., Haury, D. L., & Nehm, R. H. (2012). Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 95–121.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics,
Hewson, P. W. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S. K. Abell & N. S. Lederman (Eds.), The handbook of research on science teaching (pp. 1179–1203). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Johnson, R. L., & Peeples, E. E. (1987). The role of scientific understanding in college: student acceptance of evolution. The American Biology Teacher,
Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067–1104). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1988). Student achievement through staff development. New York: Longman.
Kampourakis, K. (2014). Understanding evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2009). Preliminary evolutionary explanations: a basic framework for conceptual change and explanatory coherence in evolution. Science & Education,
Kennedy, D., Moore, J., Alberts, B., Scott, E., Ezell, D., Singer, M., et al. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Kimball, M. E. (1967). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5(2), 110–120.
Kim, S. Y., & Nehm, R. H. (2011). A cross‐cultural comparison of korean and american science teachers’ views of evolution and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 197–227.
Korte, S. E. (2003). The acceptance and understanding of evolutionary theory among Ohio secondary life science teacher. Unpublished master thesis, Ohio University.
Lai, N. M., & Teng, C. L. (2011). Self-perceived competence correlates poorly with objectively measured competence in evidence based medicine among medical students. BMC Medical Education,
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Linting, M., Meulman, J. J., Groenen, P. J. F., & van der Koojj, A. J. (2007). Nonlinear principal components analysis: introduction and application. Psychological Methods,
Lomax, R. G. (2007). An introduction to statistical concepts (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach,
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Mabe, P. A., & West, S. G. (1982). Validity of self-evaluation of ability: a review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology,
McComas, W. F. (1996). Ten myths of science: reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics,
McCormack, G., Giles-Corti, B., Lange, A., Smith, T., Martin, K., & Pikora, T. (2004). An update of recent evidence of the relationship between objective and self-report measures of the physical environment and physical activity behaviours. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport,
Moore, R. (2002). Teaching evolution: do state standards matter? Bioscience,
Moore, R. (2007). The differing perceptions of teachers and students regarding teachers’ emphasis on evolution in high school biology classrooms. The American Biology Teacher,
Moore, R. (2008). Creationism in the biology classroom: what do teachers teach and how do they teach it? The American Biology Teacher,
Moore, R. W., & Foy, R. L. H. (1997). The scientific attitude inventory: a revision (SAI II). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 327–336.
Nadelson, L. S., & Sinatra, G. M. (2009). Educational professionals’ knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Evolutionary Psychology,
Nadelson, L. S., & Sinatra, G. M. (2010). Shifting acceptance of the understanding evolution website. The Researcher,
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nehm, R. H., Beggrow, E. P., Opfer, J. E., & Ha, M. (2012). Reasoning about natural selection: diagnosing contextual competency using the ACORNS Instrument. The American Biology Teacher,
Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Nehm, R.H., Ha, M., Rector, M., Opfer, J., Perrin, L., Ridgway, J., Mollohan, K. (2010). Scoring guide for the open response instrument (ORI) and evolutionary gain and loss test (EGALT). Technical Report of National Science Foundation REESE Project 0909999. 40 p.
Nehm, R. H., & Ridgway, J. (2011). What do experts and novices “see” in evolutionary problems? Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(4), 666–679.
Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education,
Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: a comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2010). The future of natural selection knowledge measurement: a reply to Anderson et al. (2010). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 358–362.
Nehm, R. H., Kim, S. Y., & Sheppard, K. (2009). Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: biology versus non‐biology teachers. Science Education, 93(6), 1122–1146.
Neumann, I., Neumann, K., & Nehm, R. (2011). Evaluating instrument quality in science education: rasch-based analyses of a nature of science test. International Journal of Science Education,
Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Rector, M. A., Nehm, R. H., & Pearl, D. (2013). Learning the language of evolution: lexical ambiguity and word meaning in student explanations. Research in Science Education,
Rutledge, M. L., & Sadler, K. C. (2007). Reliability of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution (MATE) instrument with university students. The American Biology Teacher,
Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). Development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics,
Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (2000). Evolutionary theory, the nature of science and high school biology teachers: critical relationships. The American Biology Teacher,
Scharmann, L. C. (1994). Teaching evolution: the influence of peer teachers’ instructional modeling. Journal of Science Teacher Education,
Scharmann, L. C., & Harris, W. M. (1992). Teaching evolution: understanding and applying the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Semb, G. B., & Ellis, J. A. (1994). Knowledge taught in school: what is remembered? Review of Educational Research,
Sickel, A. J., & Friedrichsen, P. (2013). Examining the evolution education literature with a focus on teachers: major findings, goals for teacher preparation, and directions for future research. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(1), 23.
Sinatra, G. M., Brem, S. K., & Evans, E. M. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach,
Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Science & Education,
Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. (2008). A multi-year program developing an explicit reflective pedagogy for teaching pre-service teachers the nature of science by ostention. Science & Education,
Smith, M. U., & Siegel, H. (2004). Knowing, believing, and understanding: What goals for science education? Science & Education, 13(6), 553–582.
Southerland, S. A., & Nadelson, L. S. (2012). An intentional approach to teaching evolution: Making students aware of the factors influencing learning of microevolution and macroevolution. In K. S. Rosengren, S. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 348–374). Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Trani, R. (2004). I won’t teach evolution; it’s against my religion. And now for the rest of the story. The American Biology Teacher,
Vosniadou, S. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). New York: Routledge.