Erratum to: Evo Edu Outreach (2017) 10:5 DOI 10.1186/s12052-017-0066-2
In the original publication [1] are the values for North Carolina and Nebraska incorrect in Table 2. Below you will find the correct versions.
Incorrect version:
State | Category 1 | Category 2 | Category 3 | Category 4 | Category 5 | Total points | Letter grade |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the term “evolution” used? | Is the concept of evolution clearly defined? | Multiple lines of evidence for evolution are presented (fossils, homologous structures, genetics, artificial selection, etc.) |
Natural selection Mentioned 1 point Defined 1 point |
Adaptation Mentioned 1 point Defined 1 point | |||
Max 1 pt | Max 1 pts | Max 4 pts | Max 2 pts | Max 2 pts | 10 | ||
NE | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | F |
NC | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
Correct version:
State | Category 1 | Category 2 | Category 3 | Category 4 | Category 5 | Total points | Letter grade |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the term “evolution” used? | Is the concept of evolution clearly defined? | Multiple lines of evidence for evolution are presented (fossils, homologous structures, genetics, artificial selection, etc.) |
Natural selection Mentioned 1 point Defined 1 point |
Adaptation Mentioned 1 point Defined 1 point | |||
Max 1 pt | Max 1 pts | Max 4 pts | Max 2 pts | Max 2 pts | 10 | ||
NE | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | F |
NC | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 10 | A |