Abd-El-Khalick F. Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: the impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning. Intern J Sci Edu. 2005;27:15–42.
Google Scholar
Abd-El-Khalick F, Bell R, Lederman N. The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Sci Ed. 1998;82:417–36.
Google Scholar
Aguillard D. Evolution education in Louisiana public schools: a decade following Edwards v. Aguillard. Am Bio Teach. 1999;61:182–8.
Google Scholar
Allmon WD. The “God spectrum” and the uneven search for a consistent view of the natural world. In: Schneiderman JS, Allmon WD, editors. For the rock record: geologists confront intelligent design. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2009. p. 180–239.
Google Scholar
Allmon WD, Ross RM, Kissel R. No more important lesson to teach: presenting geologic time in museum exhibits. Geosphere. 2011; (in review)
Allmon WD, Ross RM, Kendrick DL, Kissel R. Using museums to teach undergraduate paleontology and evolution. In: Teaching paleontology in the twenty-first century: resources for teaching paleontology at the undergraduate level. Yacobucci MM, Lockwood R, editors. The Paleontological Society Papers; 2012 (in press).
Alters B. Whose nature of science? J Res Sci Teach. 1997;34:39–55.
Google Scholar
Alters B. Teaching biological evolution in higher education. Methodological, religious, and non-religious issues. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett; 2005.
Google Scholar
Alters BJ, Alters SM. Defending evolution. A guide to the creation/evolution controversy. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett; 2001.
Google Scholar
Alters B, Nelson C. Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution. 2002;56:1891–901.
Google Scholar
Anderson D, Fisher K, Norman G. Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. J Res Sci Teach. 2002;39:952–78.
Google Scholar
Antolin M. Evolutionary biology of disease and Darwinian medicine. In: Ruse M, Travis J, editors. Evolution: the first four billion years. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2009. p. 281–98.
Google Scholar
Antolin M, Herbers J. Evolution’s struggle for existence in America’s public schools. Evolution. 2001;55:2379–88.
CAS
Google Scholar
Armor DA, Taylor SE. When predictions fail: the dilemma of unrealistic optimism. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman T, editors. Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Google Scholar
Asghar A, Wiles JR, Alters B. Canadian pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptions of biological evolution and evolution education. McGill J Educ. 2007;28:673–95.
Google Scholar
Audi R. Self-deception, rationalization, and reasons for acting. In: McLaughlin BP, Rorty AO, editors. Perspectives on self-deception. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1988. p. 92–120.
Google Scholar
Barefoot JC, Brummett BH, Williams RB, Siegler IC, Helms MJ, Boyle SH, et al. Recovery expectations and long-term prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 2011. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.41.
Baum DA, Offner S. Phylogenetics and tree-thinking. Am Bio Teach. 2008;70:222–9.
Google Scholar
Bering J. The belief instinct. The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. New York: Norton; 2011.
Google Scholar
Berkman MB, Plutzer E. Scientific expertise and the culture war: public opinion and the teaching of evolution in the American states. Perspect Polit. 2009;7:485–99.
Google Scholar
Berkman MB, Plutzer E. Evolution, creationism, and the battle to control America’s classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Google Scholar
Berkman MB, Pacheco JS, Plutzer E. Evolution and creationism in America’s classrooms: a national portrait. PLoS Bio. 2008. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060124.
Birnbaum MH, Anderson C, Hyman LG. Theories of bias in probability judgment. In: Caverni JP, Fabre JM, Gonzalez M, editors. Cognitive biases. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1990. p. 477–98.
Google Scholar
Bishop G. Polls apart on human origins. Rep Natl Cent Sci Educ. 2007;27:35–41.
Google Scholar
Bishop BA, Anderson CW. Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27:89–91.
Google Scholar
Blystone RV, Blodgett K. WWW: the scientific method. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2006;5:7–11.
Google Scholar
Bowler PJ. The eclipse of Darwinism: anti-Darwinian evolutionary theories in the decades around 1900. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1983.
Google Scholar
Bowman KL. The evolution battles in high-school science classes: who is teaching what? Front Ecol Environ. 2008;6:69–74.
Google Scholar
Branch G. Creationism as a global phenomenon. In: Robbins R, Cohen M, editors. Darwin and the Bible: the cultural confrontation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2008. p. 137–51.
Google Scholar
Brem SK, Ranney M, Schindel J. Perceived consequences of evolution: college students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Sci Educ. 2003;87:181–206.
Google Scholar
Bridgman PW. Reflections of a physicist. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon; 1955.
Google Scholar
Brown CM. Hindu responses to Darwinism: assimilation and rejection in a colonial and post-colonial context. Sci Educ. 2010;19:705–38.
Google Scholar
Brown JH, Gibson AC. Biogeography. St. Louis: Mosby; 1983.
Google Scholar
Browne J. Darwin in caricature: a study in the popularization and dissemination of evolution. Proc Am Phil Soc. 2001;145:496–509.
Google Scholar
Brumby MN. Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Sci Educ. 1984;68:493–503.
Google Scholar
Brumfiel G. Intelligent design: who has designs on your students’ minds? Nature. 2005;434:1062–5.
CAS
Google Scholar
California Academy of Sciences. In: American adults flunk basic science. Science Daily. 2009. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090312115133.htm. Accessed 1 Jun 2011.
Cantor G, Swetlitz M. Jewish tradition and the challenge of Darwinism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2006.
Google Scholar
Carver CS, Scheier MF, Segerstrom SC. Optimism. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30:879–89.
Google Scholar
Catley KM, Novick LR. Digging deep: exploring college students’ knowledge of macroevolutionary time. J Res Sci Teach. 2009;46:311–32.
Google Scholar
Cavallo AML, McCall D. Seeing may not be believing: examining students’ understandings and beliefs in evolution. Am Bio Teach. 2008;70:522–30.
Google Scholar
Chalmers AF. What is this thing called science? 3rd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett; 1999.
Google Scholar
Chi MTH. Common sense conceptions of emergent processes: why some misconceptions are robust. J Learn Sci. 2005;14:161–99.
Google Scholar
Chinn CA, Malhotra BA. Children’s responses to anomalous scientific data: how is conceptual change impeded? J Educ Psychol. 2002;94:327–43.
Google Scholar
Chinn CA, Samarapungavan A. Distinguishing between understanding and belief. Theory Pract. 2001;40:235–41.
Google Scholar
Cho MH, Lankford DM, Wescott DJ, Exploring the relationships among epistemological beliefs, nature of science, and conceptual change in the learning of evolutionary theory. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2011. doi:10.1007/s12052-011-0324-7.
Clark CA. “You are here”: missing links, chains of being, and the language of cartoons. Isis. 2009;100:571–89.
Google Scholar
Clough EE, Wood-Robinson C. How secondary students interpret instances of biological adaptation. J Bio Educ. 1985;19:125–30.
Google Scholar
Cobern WW. Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31:583–90.
Google Scholar
Cobern WW. The nature of science and the role of knowledge and belief. Sci Educ. 2000;9:219–46.
Google Scholar
Colburn A, Henriques L. Clergy views on evolution, creationism, science and religion. J Res Sci Teach. 2006;43:419–42.
Google Scholar
Cooper RA. The goal of evolution instruction: should we aim for belief or scientific literacy? Rep Natl Cent Sci Educ. 2001;21:14–8.
Google Scholar
Cornish-Bowden A, Cárdenas ML. The threat from creationism to the rational teaching of biology. Biol Resch. 2007;40:113–22.
Google Scholar
Cotner S, Brooks D, Moore R. Is the age of the earth one of our “sorest troubles?” Students’ perceptions about deep time affect their acceptance of evolutionary theory. Evolution. 2010;64:858–64.
Google Scholar
Coyne JA. Why evolution is true. New York: Viking; 2009a.
Google Scholar
Coyne JA. Seeing and believing. Review of “Saving Darwin: how to be a Christian and believe in evolution” by Gilberson K, and “Only a theory: evolution and the battle for America’s soul” by Miller KR. The New Republic. 2009b;240:32–9.
Google Scholar
Cummins CL, Demastes SS, Haffer MS. Evolution: biology education’s under-researched unifying theme. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31:445–8.
Google Scholar
Cunningham DL, Wescott DJ. Still more “fancy” and “myth” than “facts” in students’ conceptions of evolution. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2009;2:505–17.
Google Scholar
Davson-Galle P. Understanding: ‘knowledge’, ‘belief’ and ‘understanding’. Sci Educ. 2004;13:591–8.
Google Scholar
Dawkins R. The blind watchmaker. Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York: Norton; 1996.
Google Scholar
Dawkins R. Is science a religion? Humanist. 1997;57:26–9.
Google Scholar
Dawkins R. The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2006.
Google Scholar
Deadman JA, Kelly PJ. What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught about the topics. J Bio Educ. 1978;12:7–15.
Google Scholar
Demastes SS, Good RG, Peebles P. Students’ conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Sci Educ. 1995a;79:637–66.
Google Scholar
Demastes S, Settlage J, Good R. Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: cases of replication and comparison. J Res Sci Teach. 1995b;32:535–50.
Google Scholar
Deniz H, Donnelly LA. Preservice secondary science teachers’ acceptance of evolutionary theory and factors related to acceptance. Repts Nat Ctr Sci Educ. 2011;31(4):7.
Google Scholar
Dennett DC. Breaking the spell: religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Viking; 2006.
Google Scholar
Denton M. Evolution: a theory in crisis. New developments in science are challenging orthodox Darwinism. Bethesda: Adler & Adler; 1986.
Google Scholar
Diamond J, editor. Virus and the whale: exploring evolution in creatures small and large. Arlington: NSTA; 2006.
Google Scholar
Discovery Institute, 2003, “The Wedge document”: so what? www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349. Accessed 18 Feb 2007.
Dobzhansky T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution. Am Biol Teach 1973;35:125–129
Google Scholar
Downie JR, Barron NJ. Evolution and religion: attitudes of Scottish first year biology and medical students to the teaching of evolutionary biology. Biosci Educ E-Journal. 2000;4:1–18.
Google Scholar
Duschl R, Grandy RE. Demarcation in science education. Toward an enhanced view of scientific method. In: Taylor RS, Ferrari M, editors. Epistemology and science education. Understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy. New York: Routledge; 2011.
Google Scholar
Edis T. An illusion of harmony: science and religion in Islam. Amherst: Prometheus Books; 2007.
Google Scholar
Ellis J. How science works: evolution. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010.
Google Scholar
Evans EM. The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children. Merrill-Palmer Q. 2000a;46:19–52.
Google Scholar
Evans EM. Beyond scopes: why creationism is here to stay. In: Rosengren K, Johnson C, Harris P, editors. Imagining the impossible: the development of magical, scientific, and religious thinking in contemporary society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000b. p. 305–33.
Google Scholar
Evans EM. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: creation versus evolution. Cogn Psychol. 2001;42:217–66.
CAS
Google Scholar
Evans EM. Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: a developmental analysis. In: Vosniadou S, editor. International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge; 2008. p. 263–94.
Google Scholar
Evans EM, Spiegel A, Gram W, Frazier BF, Tare M, Thompson S, et al. A conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 2010;47:326–53.
Google Scholar
Falk JH, Dierking LD. The 95 percent solution. School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. Am Sci. 2010;98:486–93.
Google Scholar
Farber P. Teaching evolution and the nature of science. Am Bio Teach. 2003;65:347–54.
Google Scholar
Farley J. The initial reactions of French biologists to Darwin’s “Origin of Species.” J Hist Bio. 1974;7:275–300.
CAS
Google Scholar
Ferrari M, Chi MTH. The nature of naïve explanations of natural selection. Intern J Sci Educ. 1998;20:1231–56.
Google Scholar
Fine C. A mind of its own: how your brain distorts and deceives. New York: Norton; 2006.
Google Scholar
Fingarette H. Self-deception. London: Routledge Kegan & Paul; 1969 (Reissued with a new chapter, Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000).
Google Scholar
Forrest B, Gross PR. Creationism’s Trojan horse. The wedge of intelligent design. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
Google Scholar
Freeman S, Herron JC. Evolutionary analysis. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson Benjamin Cummings; 2007.
Google Scholar
Futuyma DJ. Evolution. 2nd ed. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2009.
Google Scholar
Gauch HG. Scientific method in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
Google Scholar
Gibson MT. Culture wars in state education policy: a look at the relative treatment of evolutionary theory in state science standards. Soc Sci Q. 2004;85:1129–49.
Google Scholar
Gish DT. Evolution: the fossils still say NO! El Cajon: Institute for Creation Research; 1995.
Google Scholar
Golinski J. Making natural knowledge. Constructivism and the history of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Google Scholar
González Galli LM, Meinardi EN. The role of teleological thinking in learning the Darwinian model of evolution. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2011;4:145–52.
Google Scholar
Gordon R, Franklin N, Beck J. Wishful thinking and source monitoring. Mem Cog. 2005;33:418–29.
Google Scholar
Gould SJ. Darwin’s delay. Nat Hist. 1974;83:68–70 (Reprinted (1977) In: Ever since Darwin. New York: Norton; pp. 21–27).
Google Scholar
Grantham TA. Hierarchical approaches to macroevolution: recent work on species selection and the effect hypothesis. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1995;26:301–26.
Google Scholar
Grantham TA. Hierarchies in evolution. In: Briggs DEG, Crowther PR, editors. Palaeobiology II. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2001. p. 188–92.
Google Scholar
Greene ED. The logic of university students’ misunderstanding of natural selection. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27:875–85.
Google Scholar
Gregory TR. Understanding evolutionary trees. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2008;1:121–37.
Google Scholar
Gregory TR. Understanding natural selection: essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2009;2:156–75.
Google Scholar
Griffiths M. The cognitive psychology of gambling. J Gamb Stud. 1990;6:31–42.
CAS
Google Scholar
Haack S. Defending science – within reason. Between scientism and cynicism. Paperback edition. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books; 2007; p. 411 (Originally published 2003)
Hacking I. The emergence of probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1975.
Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones E, Mills J, editors. Cognitive dissonance. Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999.
Harrison P. Introduction. In: Harrision P, editor. The Cambridge companion to science and religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 1–17.
Google Scholar
Harvey N. Wishful thinking impairs belief-desire reasoning: a case of decoupling failure in adults? Cognition. 1992;45:141–62.
CAS
Google Scholar
Hazen RM, Trefil J. Science matters: achieving scientific literacy. New York: Anchor Books; 2009.
Google Scholar
Hendry AP, Kinnison MT, Heino M, Day T, Smith TB, Fitt G, et al. Evolutionary principles and their practical application. Evol Appl. 2011;4:159–83.
Google Scholar
Hofmann JR, Weber BH. The fact of evolution: implications for science education. Sci Educ. 2003;12:729–60.
Google Scholar
Hofstadter R. Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Knopf; 1963.
Google Scholar
Hokayem H, BouJaoude S. College students’ perceptions of the theory of evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 2008;45:395–419.
Google Scholar
Holland JH. Emergence: from chaos to order. Reading: Helix Books; 1998.
Google Scholar
Hull DL. Darwin and his critics: the reception of Darwin’s theory of evolution by the scientific community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1973.
Google Scholar
Hull DL. Defining Darwinism. Stud Hist Philos Bio Biomed Sci. 2011;42:2–4.
Google Scholar
Ingram EL, Nelson CE. Relationship between achievement and students’ acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. J Res Sci Teach. 2006;43:7–24.
Google Scholar
Isaacowitz DM. The gaze of the optimist. Personal Soc Psych Bull. 2005;31:407–15.
Google Scholar
Isaak M. The counter-creationism handbook. Westport: Greenwood; 2006.
Google Scholar
Jakobi SR. “Little monkeys on the grass…” How people for and against evolution fail to understand the theory of evolution. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2010;3:416–9.
Google Scholar
Jansen LA, Appelbaum PS, Klein WMP, Weinstein N, Cook W, Fogel JS, et al. Unrealistic optimism in early-phase oncology trials. Ethics Hum Res. 2011;33:1–8.
Google Scholar
Jensen MS, Finley FN. Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Sci Educ. 1995;79:147–66.
Google Scholar
Jensen MS, Finley FN. Changes in students’ understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. J Res Sci Teach. 1996;33:879–900.
Google Scholar
Johnson PE. Darwin on trial. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway; 1991.
Google Scholar
Johnson PE. Reason in the balance. The case against naturalism in science, law and education. Downers Grove: InterVarsity; 1995.
Google Scholar
Jungwirth E. The problem of teleology in biology as a problem of biology-teacher education. J Bio Educ. 1975;9:243–6.
Google Scholar
Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Jour Risk Res. 2011;14:147–74.
Google Scholar
Kampourakis K, McComas WF. Charles Darwin and evolution: illustrating human aspects of science. Sci Educ. 2010;19:637–54.
Google Scholar
Kampourakis K, Zogza V. Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Sci Educ. 2008;17:27–47.
Google Scholar
Kelemen D. Why are rocks pointy? Children’s preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Dev Psychol. 1999a;35:1440–52.
CAS
Google Scholar
Kelemen D. Beliefs about purpose: on the origins of teleological thought. In: Corballis MC, Lea SEG, editors. The descent of mind: psychological perspectives on hominid evolution. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999b. p. 278–94.
Google Scholar
Kelemen D. Functions, goals and intentions: children’s teleological reasoning about objects. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999c;12:461–8.
Google Scholar
Kelemen D. Teleological minds: how natural intuitions about agency and purpose influence learning about evolution. In: Rosengren K, Sinatra G, Brem S, Evans M, editors. Evolution challenges: integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011; in press
Kida T. Don’t believe everything you think. The six basic mistakes we make in thinking. Amherst: Prometheus Books; 2006.
Google Scholar
Krizan Z, Windschitl PD. Wishful thinking about the future: does desire impact optimism? Soc Pers Psychol Compass. 2009;3:227–43.
Google Scholar
Kugler C. Darwin’s theory, Mendel’s laws: labels and the teaching of science. Am Bio Teach. 2002;64:341–51.
Google Scholar
Lachman SP. One nation under God: religion in contemporary American society. New York: Harmony Books; 1993.
Google Scholar
Largent MA. Darwin’s analogy between artificial and natural selection in the Origin of Species. In: Ruse M, Richards RJ, editors. The Cambridge companion to the “Origin of Species.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 14–29.
Google Scholar
Lawson AE. Predicting science achievement: the role of developmental level, disembedding ability, mental capacity, prior knowledge and beliefs. J Res Sci Teach. 1983;19:233–48.
Google Scholar
Lawson AE. A review of research on formal reasoning and science teaching. J Res Sci Teach. 1985;22:569–618.
Google Scholar
Lawson AE, Thompson LD. Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. J Res Sci Teach. 1988;25:733–46.
Google Scholar
Lawson AE, Weser J. The rejection of nonscientific beliefs about life: effects of instruction and reasoning skills. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27:589–606.
Google Scholar
Lawson AE, Worsnop WA. Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: effects of relative reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. J Res Sci Teach. 1992;29:143–66.
Google Scholar
Lazar A. Deceiving oneself or self-deceived? On the formation of beliefs “under the influence.” Mind. 1999;108:265–90.
Google Scholar
Lederman NG. Students’ and teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science: a review of the research. J Res Sci Teach. 1992;29:331–59.
Google Scholar
Lederman NG. Nature of science: past, present, and future. In: Abell SK, Lederman NG, editors. Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 2004. p. 831–80.
Google Scholar
Lennox JG. Darwin was a teleologist. Biol Philos. 1993;8:409–21.
Google Scholar
Liang C, Dunn P. In: Are entrepreneurs optimistic, realistic, both or fuzzy? Relationship between entrepreneurial traits and entrepreneurial learning. Acad Entrep J. 2008. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6005/is_1-2_14/ai_n32106818/?tag=content;col1. Accessed 19 Jul 2011
Lipps J. The decline of reason? In: Scotchmoor J, McKinney FK, editors. Learning from the fossil record. The Paleontological Society papers, vol. 2. Lawrence: The Paleontological Society; 2006. p. 3–10.
Google Scholar
Livingstone D. Darwin’s forgotten defenders: the encounter between evangelical theology and evolutionary thought. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans; 1984.
Google Scholar
Lombrozo T, Shtulman A, Weisberg M. The intelligent design controversy: lessons from psychology and education. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006;10:56–7.
Google Scholar
Lombrozo T, Thanukos A, Weisberg M. The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2008;1:290–8.
Google Scholar
Lord T, Marino S. How university students view the theory of evolution. Jour Col Sci Teach. 1993;22:353–7.
Google Scholar
Lovallo D, Kahneman D. Delusions of success: how optimism undermines executives’ decisions. Harv Bus Rev. 2003;81:56–63.
Google Scholar
Lovely EC, Kondrick LC. Teaching evolution: challenging religious preconceptions. Integr Comp Bio. 2008;48:164–74.
Google Scholar
Martin JW. Compatibility of major U.S. Christian denominations with evolution. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2010;3:420–31.
Google Scholar
Mayr E. The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1982.
Google Scholar
Mayr E. What is Darwinism today? Proc Bienn Meet, Philos Sci Assoc. 1986;2:145–56.
Google Scholar
Mayr E. Cause and effect in biology. In: Mayr E, editor. Toward a new philosophy of biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1988. p. 67–74.
Google Scholar
Mazur A. Believers and disbelievers in evolution. Pol Life Sci. 2005;23:55–61.
Google Scholar
McComas WF. Science and its myths. The skeptic encyclopedia of pseudoscience. Santa Barbara: ABC CLIO; 2002. p. 430–42.
Google Scholar
McComas WF, Almazroa H, Clough MPO. The nature of science in science education: an introduction. Sci Educ. 1998;7:511–32.
Google Scholar
McDonald CV. The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach. 2010;47:1137–64.
Google Scholar
McKeachie WJ, Lin YG, Strayer J. Creationist vs. evolutionary beliefs: effects on learning biology. Am Bio Teach. 2002;64:189–92.
Google Scholar
McVaugh NK, Birchfield J, Lucero MM, Petrosino AJ. Evolution education: seeing the forest for the trees and focusing our efforts on the teaching of evolution. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2011;4:286–92.
Google Scholar
Mead LS, Scott EC. Problem concepts in evolution part I: purpose and design. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2010a;3:78–81.
Google Scholar
Mead LS, Scott EC. Problem concepts in evolution part II: cause and chance. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2010b;3:261–4.
Google Scholar
Meadows L. The missing link. An inquiry approach for teaching all students about evolution. Portsmouth: Heinemann; 2009.
Google Scholar
Meisel RP. Teaching tree-thinking to undergraduate biology students. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2010. doi:10.1007/s12052-010-0254-9.
Miller KR. Finding Darwin’s God: a scientist’s search for common ground between God and evolution. New York: Harper Perennial; 1999.
Google Scholar
Miller JD. The conceptualization and measurement of civic scientific literacy for the twenty-first century. In: Meinwald J, Hildebrand JG, editors. Science and the educated American: a core component of liberal education. Cambridge: American Academy of Arts and Sciences; 2010. p. 241–54.
Google Scholar
Miller JD, Scott EC, Okamoto S. Public acceptance of evolution. Science. 2006;313:765–6.
CAS
Google Scholar
Mindel D. The evolving world. Evolution in everyday life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2006.
Google Scholar
Mooney C. We can’t handle the truth. The science of why we don’t believe science. Mother Jones. 2011;36:40–5.
Google Scholar
Mooney C, Kirschenbaum S. Unscientific America. How scientific illiteracy threatens our future. New York: Basic Books; 2009.
Google Scholar
Moore JA. Science as a way of knowing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1993.
Google Scholar
Moore R. Creationism in the biology classroom: what do teachers teach and how do they teach it? Am Bio Teach. 2008;70:79–84.
Google Scholar
Moore R, Cotner S. Rejecting Darwin: the occurrence and impact of creationism in high school biology classrooms. Am Bio Teach. 2009;70:79–84.
Google Scholar
Moore R, Mitchell G, Bally R, Inglis M, Day J, Jacobs D. Undergraduates’ understanding of evolution: ascriptions of agency as a problem for student learning. J Bio Educ. 2002;36:65–70.
Google Scholar
Moreland JP. Christianity and the nature of science. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House; 1989.
Google Scholar
Nadelson LS, Southerland SA. Examining the interaction of acceptance and understanding: how does the relationship change with a focus on macroevolution? Evol: Educ Outreach. 2010;3:82–8.
Google Scholar
Nanda M. Prophets facing backward: postmodern critiques of science and Hindu nationalism in India. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2003.
Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy; 1998.
Google Scholar
National Research Council. Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits. In: Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments, Bell P, Lewenstein B, Shouse A W, Feder M A, editors. Washington, DC: National Academies; 2009.
Nehm RH, Reilly L. Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioSci. 2007;57:263–72.
Google Scholar
Nehm RH, Schonfeld IS. Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? J Sci Teach Educ. 2007;18:699–723.
Google Scholar
Nehm RH, Kim SY, Sheppard K. Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: biology versus non-biology teachers. Sci Educ. 2009;93:1122–46.
Google Scholar
Nehm RH, Rector MA, Ha M. “Force-talk” in evolutionary explanation: metaphors and misconceptions. Evo Edu Outreach 2010;3:605–613.
Google Scholar
Nelson CE. Teaching evolution effectively: a central dilemma and alternative strategies. McGill J Educ. 2007;42:265–83.
Google Scholar
Nelson CE. Teaching evolution (and all of biology) more effectively: strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions. Integr Comp Bio. 2008;48:213–25.
Google Scholar
Nelson CE, Nickels MK, Beard J. The nature of science as the foundation for teaching science: evolution as a case study. In: McComas WF, editor. The nature of science in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1998.
Google Scholar
Newell ND. Why scientists believe in evolution. Alexandria: American Geological Institute; 1984.
Google Scholar
Nickels MN, Nelson CE, Beard J. Better biology teaching by emphasizing evolution and the nature of science. Am Bio Teach. 1996;58:332–6.
Google Scholar
Numbers RL. The creationists. Expanded ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2006.
Google Scholar
O’Brien DT, Wilson DS, Hawley PH. “Evolution for Everyone”: a course that expands evolutionary theory beyond the biological sciences. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2009;2:445–57.
Google Scholar
Oliveira AW, Cook K, Buck GA. Framing evolution discussion intellectually. J Res Sci Teach. 2011;48:257–80.
Google Scholar
Osif BA. Evolution and religious beliefs: a survey of Pennsylvania high school teachers. Am Bio Teach. 1997;59:552–6.
Google Scholar
Padian K. How to win the evolution war: teach macroevolution. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2010;3:206–14.
Google Scholar
Padian K, Angielczyk KD. Are there transitional forms in the fossil record? In: Kelley PH, Bryan JR, Hansen TA, editors. The evolution-creation controversy II: perspectives on science, religion, and geological education. The Paleontological Society papers, vol. 5. Lawrence: The Paleontological Society; 1999. p. 47–82.
Google Scholar
Parsons KM, editor. The science wars: debating scientific knowledge and technology. Amherst: Prometheus Books; 2003.
Google Scholar
Paterson FRA, Rossow LF. “Chained to the devil’s throne”: evolution and creation science as a religio-political issue. Am Bio Teach. 1999;61:358–64.
Google Scholar
Paz-y-Miño C, Espinosa G. New England faculty and college students differ in their views about evolution, creationism, intelligent design, and religiosity. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2010. doi:10.1007/s12052-010-0298-x
Pedersen S, Halldén O. Intuitive ideas and scientific explanations as parts of students’ developing understanding of biology: the case of evolution. Eur J Psychol Educ. 1994;9:127–37.
Google Scholar
Pennock RT. Naturalism, evidence and creationism: the case of Phillip Johnson. Biol Philos. 1996;11:543–59.
Google Scholar
Pennock RT. Tower of Babel: the evidence against the new creationism. Cambridge: MIT; 1999.
Google Scholar
People for the American Way Foundation. Evolution and creationism in public education: an in-depth reading of public opinion. Danbury: DYG, Inc.; 2000.
Google Scholar
Pierce C. Idiot America: how stupidity became a virtue in the land of the free. New York: Doubleday; 2009.
Google Scholar
Pigliucci M. Denying evolution. Creationism, scientism, and the nature of science. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2002.
Google Scholar
Pigliucci M. The evolution-creation wars: why teaching more evolution just is not enough. McGill J Educ. 2007;42:285–306.
Google Scholar
Plutzer E, Berkman E. Evolution, creationism, and the teaching of human origins in schools. Public Opin Q. 2008;72:540–53.
Google Scholar
Pohl RF. Cognitive illusions. A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgment and memory. New York: Psychology; 2004.
Google Scholar
Poling DA, Evans EM. Religious belief, scientific expertise, and folk ecology. J Cogn Cult. 2004;4:485–524.
Google Scholar
Popper KR. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books; 1959.
Google Scholar
Pramling N. The role of metaphor in Darwin and the implications for teaching evolution. Sci Educ. 2008;93:535–47.
Google Scholar
Prothero D. Evolution. What the fossils say and why it matters. New York: Columbia University Press; 2007.
Google Scholar
Provine WB. Evolution, religion, and science. In: Clayton P, Simpson Z, editors. The Oxford handbook of religion and science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 667–80.
Google Scholar
Provine WB. Afterword. In: The origins of theoretical population genetics. (Originally published 1971.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2001. p. 197–205.
Reid GB. Biological emergences. Evolution by natural experiment. Cambridge: MIT; 2007.
Google Scholar
Reiss JO. Not by design. Retiring Darwin’s watchmaker. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2009.
Google Scholar
Richards RA. Philosophical challenges in teaching evolution. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2008;1:158–64.
Google Scholar
Robbins RH, Cohen MN. Darwin and the Bible. The cultural confrontation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2008.
Google Scholar
Rosset E. It’s no accident: our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition. 2008;108:771–80.
Google Scholar
Rudolph JL. Reconsidering the ‘nature of science’ as a curriculum component. J Curric Stud. 2000;32:403–19.
Google Scholar
Rudolph JL, Stewart J. Evolution and the nature of science: on the historical discord and its implications for education. J Res Sci Teach. 1998;35:1069–89.
Google Scholar
Ruse M. Darwinism. In: Keller EF, Lloyd EA, editors. Keywords in evolutionary biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1992. p. 74–80.
Google Scholar
Ruse M. The Darwinian revolution. Science red in tooth and claw. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1999.
Google Scholar
Ruse M. Can a Darwinian be a Christian? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
Google Scholar
Ruse M. Darwinism and mechanism: metaphor in science. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci. 2005;36:285–302.
Google Scholar
Rutledge ML, Mitchell MA. High school biology teachers’ knowledge structure, acceptance and teaching of evolution. Am Bio Teach. 2002;64:21–8.
Google Scholar
Rutledge ML, Sadler KC. Reliability of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution (MATE) instrument with university students. Am Bio Teach. 2007;69:332–5.
Google Scholar
Rutledge ML, Warden MA. The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. Sch Sci Math. 1999;99:13–8.
Google Scholar
Rutledge L, Warden MA. Evolutionary theory, the nature of science and high school biology teachers: critical relationships. Am Bio Teach. 2000;62:23–31.
Google Scholar
Sagan C. The demon-haunted world: science as a candle in the dark. New York: Ballantine Books; 1996.
Google Scholar
Samarapungavan A, Wiers RW. Children’s thoughts on the origin of species: a study of explanatory coherence. Cogn Sci. 1997;21:147–77.
Google Scholar
Sandvik H. Tree thinking cannot be taken for granted: challenges for teaching phylogenetics. Theor Biosci. 2008;127:45–51.
Google Scholar
Scharmann LC, Smith MU, James MC, Jensen M. Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. J Res Sci Teach. 2005;16:27–41.
Google Scholar
Scott EC. Evolution vs. creationism. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2009.
Google Scholar
Scott EC, Branch G. Don’t call it “Darwinism.” Evol: Educ Outreach. 2009;2:90–4.
Google Scholar
Scott-Kakures D. Self-deception and internal irrationality. Philos Phenom Res. 1996;56:31–56.
Google Scholar
Shanks N. God, the Devil, and Darwin. A critique of intelligent design theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
Google Scholar
Sharot T. The optimism bias. A tour of the irrationally positive brain. New York: Pantheon; 2011.
Google Scholar
Shermer M. Why Darwin matters. The case against intelligent design. New York: Times Books; 2006.
Google Scholar
Shermer M. Why people believe weird things: pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. New York: MJF Books; 2007.
Google Scholar
Shermer M. The believing brain. From ghosts and gods to politics and conspiracies -- How we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths. New York: Times Books; 2011
Shtulman A. Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution. Cogn Psychol. 2006;52:170–94.
Google Scholar
Shtulman A. Why people do not understand evolution. An analysis of the cognitive barriers to fully grasping the unity of life. Skeptic. 2011;16:2–6.
Google Scholar
Shtulman A, Schulz L. The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cogn Sci. 2008;32:1049–62.
Google Scholar
Shtulman A, Calabi P. Learning, understanding, and acceptance: the case of evolution. In: Love BC, McRae K, Sloutsky VM, editors. Proc 30th Ann Conf Cogn Sci Soc, Austin; 2008. p. 235–40
Sinatra GM, Southerland SA, McConaughy F, Demastes JW. Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 2003;40:510–28.
Google Scholar
Sinatra GM, Brem SK, Evans EM. Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2008;1:189–95.
Google Scholar
Sinclair A, Pendarvis MP. The relationship between college zoology students’ beliefs about evolutionary theory and religion. J Res Dev Educ. 1997;30:118–25.
Google Scholar
Slotta JD, Chi MT. Helping students understand challenging topics in science through ontology training. Cogn Instr. 2006;24:261–89.
Google Scholar
Smith MU. Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: I. Philosophical/epistemological issues. Sci Educ. 2010a;19:523–38.
Google Scholar
Smith MU. Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Sci Educ. 2010b;19:539–71.
Google Scholar
Smith MU, Siegel H. Knowing, believing, and understanding: what goals for science education? Sci Educ. 2004;13:553–82.
Google Scholar
Smith MU, Siegel H, McInerney JD. Foundational issues in evolution education. Sci Edu. 1995;4:23–46.
Google Scholar
Sokal AD. Beyond the hoax. Science, philosophy and culture. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Google Scholar
Southerland SA, Nadelson LS. The development and evaluation of the measure of understanding of macroevolution: introducing the MUM. J Exp Educ. 2011;78:151–90.
Google Scholar
Southerland SA, Sinatra GM, Matthews M. Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educ Psychol Rev. 2001;13:325–51.
Google Scholar
Sutherland S. Irrationality: the enemy within. New York: Penguin; 1994.
Google Scholar
Tamir P, Zohar A. Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Sci Educ. 1991;75:57–67.
Google Scholar
Thagard P, Findlay S. Getting to Darwin: obstacles to accepting evolution by natural selection. Sci Educ. 2009. doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9204-8.
Thompson JN. Use the word evolution. Evol: Educ Outreach. 2008;1:42–3.
Google Scholar
Thomson KS. The meanings of evolution. Am Sci. 1982;70:529–31.
CAS
Google Scholar
Tracy JL, Hart J, Martens JP. Death and science: the existential underpinnings of belief in intelligent design and discomfort with evolution. PLoS ONE. 2011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017349
Trani RI. Won’t teach evolution: it’s against my religion. And now for the rest of the story. Am Bio Teach. 2004;66:419–27.
Google Scholar
Trivers R. Social evolution. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings; 1985.
Google Scholar
Verhey SD. The effect of engaging prior learning on students’ attitudes towards creationism and evolution. BioSci. 2005;55:996–1003.
Google Scholar
Watts DJ. Everything is obvious: *Once you know the answer. New York: Crown Business; 2011.
Google Scholar
Weinberg S. Peace at last? In: Labinger JA, Collins H, editors. The one culture? A conversation about science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2001. p. 238–40.
Google Scholar
Weiss K. Biology’s theoretical kudzu: the irrepressible illusion of teleology. Evol Anthr. 2002;11:4–8.
Google Scholar
Wells J. Icons of evolution: science or myth? Why much of what we teach about evolution is wrong. Washington, DC: Regnery; 2002.
Google Scholar
Wells W, Moriarty S, Burnett J. Advertising. Principles and practice. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006.
Google Scholar
Wiles JR. Overwhelming scientific confidence in evolution and its centrality in science education—and the public disconnect. Sci Educ Rev. 2010;9:18–27.
Google Scholar
Wiles JR, Alters B. Effects of an educational experience incorporating an inventory of factors potentially influencing student acceptance of biological evolution. Int J Sci Educ. 2011. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.565522
Williams JD. Belief versus acceptance: why do people not believe in evolution? BioEssays. 2009;3:1255–62.
Google Scholar
Wilson DS. Evolution for everyone: how to increase acceptance of, interest in, and knowledge about evolution. PLoS Bio. 2005;3:e364. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030364.
Google Scholar
Wilson DS. Evolution for everyone: how Darwin’s theory can change the way we think about our lives. New York: Delacorte; 2007.
Google Scholar
Wolpert L. Six impossible things before breakfast: the evolutionary origins of belief. London: Faber and Faber; 2006.
Google Scholar
Woods CS, Scharmann LC. High school students’ perceptions of evolutionary theory. Electronic J Sci Educ. 2001;6(2).
Yacoubian HA, BouJaoude S. The effect of reflective discussions following inquiry-based laboratory activities on students’ views of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach. 2010;47:1229–52.
Google Scholar
Young RM. Darwin’s metaphor. Nature’s place in Victorian culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
Google Scholar
Ziman J. Real science. What it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
Google Scholar