Abraham-Silver L, Kisiel J. Comparing visitors’ conceptions of evolution: examining understanding outside the United States. Visit Stud. 2008;11(1):41–54.
Article
Google Scholar
Alters B. Teaching biological evolution in higher education: methodological, religious, and nonreligious issues. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett; 2005.
Google Scholar
Alters BJ, Nelson CE. Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution. 2002;56(10):1891–901.
Article
Google Scholar
Anderson D, Fisher KM, Norman GJ. Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. J Res Sci Teach. 2002;39(10):952–78.
Article
Google Scholar
Banet E, Ayuso GE. Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school. Int J Sci Educ. 2003;25:373–407.
Article
Google Scholar
Behe MJ. Darwin’s black box: the biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: Free Press; 1996.
Google Scholar
Bishop BA, Anderson CW. Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27(5):415–27.
Article
Google Scholar
Brem SK, Ranney M, Schindel J. Perceived consequences of evolution: college students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Sci Educ. 2003;87(2):181–206.
Article
Google Scholar
Brumby MA. Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Sci Educ. 1984;68(4):493–50.
Article
Google Scholar
Catley KM, Novick LR. Digging deep: exploring college students’ knowledge of macroevolutionary time. J Res Sci Teach. 2009;46(3):311–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Catley K, Lehrer R, Reiser B (2005) Tracing a prospective learning progression for developing understanding of evolution. In: National Academies Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement, 2005. National Academy of Sciences, Washington. pp. 2–67.
Chen S. Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science. Sci Educ. 2006;90(5):803–19.
Article
Google Scholar
Chinn CA, Brewer WF. The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: a theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Rev Educ Res. 1993;63(1):1–49.
Article
Google Scholar
Dagher ZR, BouJaoude S. Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: the case of biological evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1997;34(5):429–45.
Article
Google Scholar
Dean C (2007). Believing scripture but playing by science’s rules. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/12/science/12geologist.html?ei=5094&en=aabaccdd1cf242ba&hp=&ex=1171256400&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print. Accessed 12 Feb 2007
Demastes SS, Good RG, Peebles P. Students’ conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Sci Educ. 1995;79(6):637–66.
Article
Google Scholar
Demastes SS, Good RG, Peebles P. Patterns of conceptual change in evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1996;33(4):407–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Dodick J, Orion N. Cognitive factors affecting student understanding of geologic time. J Res Sci Teach. 2003a;40(4):415–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Dodick J, Orion N. Measuring student understanding of geological time. Sci Educ. 2003b;87(5):708–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Ehrlinger J, Johnson K, Banner M, Dunning D. Why the unskilled are unaware: further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2008;105(1):98–121.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Evans EM. Beyond Scopes: why creationism is here to stay. In: Rosengren KS, Johnson CN, Harris P, editors. Imagining the impossible: magical scientific and religious thinking in children. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000a. p. 305–33.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Evans EM. The emergence of beliefs about the origin of species in school-age children. Merrill Palmer Q. 2000b;46(2):221–54.
Google Scholar
Evans ME. Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: a developmental analysis. In: Vosniadou S, editor. International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge; 2008. p. 263–94.
Google Scholar
Eve RA, Harrold FB. The creationist movement in modern America. Boston: Twane Publishers; 1991.
Google Scholar
Fail J. A no-holds-barred ecology curriculum for elementary and junior high school students. Am Biol Teach. 2003;65(5):341–6.
Google Scholar
Fail J. A no-holds-barred evolution curriculum for elementary and junior high school students. Evolution: Education and Outreach. 2008;1:56–64.
Google Scholar
Ferrari M, Chi M. The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. Int J Sci Educ. 1998;20(10):1231–56.
Article
Google Scholar
Firenze R. Lamarck vs Darwin: dueling theories. Rep Natl Cent Sci Educ. 1997;17(4):9–11.
Google Scholar
Geraedts C, Boersma K. Reinventing natural selection. Int J Sci Educ. 2006;28(8):843–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Gould SJ. Full house: the spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. 1st ed. New York: Harmony Books; 1996.
Book
Google Scholar
Haldane JBS. The causes of evolution. 1st ed. New York: Harper & Brothers; 1932.
Google Scholar
Hammond PE, Hunter JD. On maintaining plausibility: the worldview of evangelical college students. J Sci Study Relig. 1984;23(3):221–38.
Article
Google Scholar
Jensen MS, Finley FN. Changes in students’ understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. J Res Sci Teach. 1996;33(8):879–900.
Article
Google Scholar
Johnson PE. Darwin on trial. Downer’s Grove: InterVarsity Press; 1993.
Google Scholar
Kendeou P, van den Broek P. The effects of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. J Educ Psychol. 2005;97(2):235–45.
Article
Google Scholar
Kendeou P, van den Broek P. The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Mem Cogn. 2007;35(7):1567–77.
Article
Google Scholar
Krajcik JS, Shin N, Stevens SY, Short H. Using learning progressions to inform the design of coherent science curriculum materials. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, 2009, April.
Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77(6):1121–34.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware—but why? A reply to Krueger and Mueller. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(2):189–92.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kruger J, Mueller RA. Unskilled, unaware, or both? The better-than average heuristic and statistical regression predict errors in estimates of own performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(2):180–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Lawson AE, Worsnop WA. Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. J Res Sci Teach. 1992;29(2):143–66.
Article
Google Scholar
Lehrer R, Schauble L. Modeling natural variation through distribution. Am Educ Res J. 2004;41(3):635–79.
Article
Google Scholar
Lehrer R, Schauble L. Developing modeling and argument in elementary grades. In: Romberg TA, Carpenter TP, Dremock F, editors. Understanding mathematics and science matters. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005. p. 29–53.
Lovely EC, Kondrick LC. Teaching evolution: challenging religious preconceptions. Integr Comp Biol. 2008;48(2):164–74.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
McComas WF, Almazroa H, Clough MP. The nature of science in science education: an introduction. Sci Educ. 1998;7:511–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Merritt JD, Krajcik J, Schwartz Y. Development of a learning progression for the particle model of matter. 2008. Retrieved from http://www.fi.uu.nl/en/icls2008/438/paper438.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2008
National Research Council (NRC). Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington: National Academies Press; 2007.
Google Scholar
Nehm RH, Reilly L. Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. Bioscience. 2007;57(3):263–72.
Article
Google Scholar
Nehm RH, Schonfeld IS. Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? J Sci Teach Educ. 2007;18(5):699–723.
Article
Google Scholar
Numbers RL. The creationists: the evolution of scientific creationism. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1992.
Google Scholar
Numbers RL. Darwinism comes to America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1998.
Google Scholar
Nussbaum E, Sinatra GM. Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2003;28(3):384–95.
Article
Google Scholar
Petrosino AJ, Lehrer R, Schauble L. Structuring error and experimental variation as distribution in the fourth grade. Math Think Learn. 2003;5(2&3):131–56.
Article
Google Scholar
Ross MR. Richness trends of mosasaurs (diapsida, squamata) during the late cretaceous. Kingston: University of Rhode Island; 2007.
Google Scholar
Samarapungavan A, Wiers R. Children’s thoughts on the origin of species: a study of explanatory coherence. Cogn Sci. 1997;21(2):147–77.
Article
Google Scholar
Settlage JJ. Conceptions of natural selection: a snapshot of the sense-making process. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31(5):449–57.
Article
Google Scholar
Settlage JJ, Jensen MS. Investigating the inconsistencies in college student responses to natural selection test questions. 1996. Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu. Accessed 25 August 2008.
Sinatra GM, Southerland SA, McConaughy F. Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 2003;40(5):510–28.
Article
Google Scholar
Songer NB, Kelcey B, Gotwals AW. How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego. 2009, April.
Sullivan J (Producer), Stein B, Miller K (Writers), Frankowski N (Director). Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. [Motion picture]. United States: Premise Media Corporation. 2008.
Trend RD. Conceptions of geological time among primary teacher trainees with reference to their engagement with geoscience, history and science. Int J Sci Educ. 2000;22(5):539–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Trend RD. Deep time framework: a preliminary study of U.K. primary teachers’ conceptions of geological time and perceptions of geoscience. J Res Sci Teach. 2001;38(2):191–221.
Article
Google Scholar
van den Broek P, Kendeou P. Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: the role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2008;22(3):335–51.
Article
Google Scholar
Watson JM, Callingham RA, Kelly BA. Students’ appreciation of expectation and variation as a foundation for statistical understanding. Math Think Learn. 2007;9(2):83–130.
Article
Google Scholar
Wells J. Icons of evolution: science or myth? Why much of what we teach about evolution is wrong. Washington: Regnery Publishing; 2002.
Google Scholar