Skip to main content

Table 3 The structure of teleological explanations; the difference is in the underlying consequence etiology

From: Students’ “teleological misconceptions” in evolution education: why the underlying design stance, not teleology per se, is the problem

 

Observation

1st inference: Teleological inference

2nd inference: Consequence etiology

Misconception/illegitimate explanation

Organisms have structure A that performs function B

Structure A exists in order to perform function B

Structure A exists in order to perform function B because a designer intentionally designed it for this purpose (design teleology—external)

Misconception/illegitimate explanation

Organisms have structure A that performs function B

Structure A exists in order to perform function B

Structure A exists in order to perform function B because it is necessary to its bearers for their survival/reproduction (design teleology—internal)

Legitimate explanation

Organisms have structure A that performs function B

Structure A exists in order to perform function B

Structure A was selectively favored because the function B that it performs confers an advantage to its bearers for their survival/reproduction (selection teleology)