Skip to main content

Table 3 Multiple linear regression model results for reported engagement and relevance scores during class activity

From: A comparison study of human examples vs. non-human examples in an evolution lesson leads to differential impacts on student learning experiences in an introductory biology course

 

Engagement with lesson content

Perceived relevance of lesson content

CC

MI

CC

MI

Î’

(Std. error)

p-value

Î’

(Std. error)

p-value

Î’

(Std. error)

p-value

Î’

(Std. error)

p-value

Intercept

4.86

(3.49 – 6.23)

 < 0.001

5.024

(4.332 – 5.72)

 < 0.001

8.04

(6.43 – 9.66)

 < 0.001

8.404

(7.64 – 9.17)

 < 0.001

Engagement with course content

0.58

(0.49 – 0.68)

 < 0.001

0.567

(0.52 – 0.62)

 < 0.001

-

-

-

-

Perceived relevance of course content

-

-

-

-

0.49

(0.38 – 0.59)

 < 0.001

0.45

(0.40 – 0.50)

 < 0.001

Year (Reference: Year 1)

− 0.51

(– 1.36 to 0.35)

0.248

− 0.319

(-0.71 – 0.07)

0.409

− 0.46

(– 1.40 to 0.47)

0.333

− 0.141

(– 0.53 – 0.25)

0.716

I-SEA (Centered)

− 0.05

(– 0.15 to 0.06)

0.359

0.01

(– 0.04 – 0.06)

0.838

− 0.09

(– 0.20 to 0.03)

0.157

− 0.089

(– 0.14 – 0.04)

0.083

Treatment (Reference: Animal)

− 0.37

(– 1.20 to 0.47)

0.389

− 0.431

(– 0.83 – 0.03)

0.283

− 0.29

(–1.23 to 0.65)

0.544

− 0.455

(– 0.89 – 0.02)

0.299

Treatment X I-SEA

0.06

(– 0.10 to 0.22)

0.474

− 0.021

(– 0.09 – 0.05)

0.765

0.18

(0.00 – 0.36)

0.048

0.148

(0.07 – 0.22)

0.052

Observations

281

673

285

673

R2 / adjusted R2

0.366/0.355

 

0.247/0.234

 
  1. Full model results predicting student engagement and relevance post-scores using complete-case data (CC) and multiple imputation (MI). Year and treatment are binary variables with reference values in parentheses. MI results are pooled following Rubin (2004). Coefficients significant at p ≤ 0.05 are bolded