Skip to main content

Table 2 Multiple linear regression model results for post-class tree thinking concept inventory scores

From: A comparison study of human examples vs. non-human examples in an evolution lesson leads to differential impacts on student learning experiences in an introductory biology course

 

TTCI Post-Score (Model 1)

TTCI Post-Score (Model 2)

CC

MI

CC

MI

Î’

(Std. error)

p-value

Î’

(Std. error)

p-value

Î’

(Std. error)

p-value

Î’

(Std. error)

p-value

Intercept

1.96

(1.44 – 2.49)

 < 0.001

1.895

(1.66 – 2.13)

 < 0.001

2.50

(1.86 – 3.14)

 < 0.001

2.428

(2.14–2.72)

 < 0.001

TTCI Pre-Score

0.59

(0.49 – 0.69)

 < 0.001

0.606

(0.558 – 0.654)

 < 0.001

0.46

(0.32 – 0.60)

 < 0.001

0.468

(0.40 - 0.54)

 < 0.001

Year (Reference: Year 1)

− 0.40

(− 0.82 to 0.01)

0.059

− 0.22

(– 0.39 to – 0.05)

0.197

− 0.41

(– 0.83 to 0.00)

0.050

− 0.254

(− 0.42 – 0.09)

0.134

I-SEAH (Centered)

0.02

(− 0.03 to 0.08)

0.393

0.032

(0.01 – 0.06)

0.196

0.01

(– 0.03 to 0.05)

0.560

0.012

(− 0.01 – 0.03)

0.502

Treatment (Reference: Animal)

0.35

(− 0.07 to 0.77)

0.102

0.281

(0.09 – 0.48)

0.153

− 0.77

(– 1.65 to 0.12)

0.090

− 0.692

(– 1.094 to − 0 .29)

0.086

Treatment X I-SEAH

− 0.03

(− 0.11 to 0.05)

0.477

− 0.042

(− 0.08 − 0.01)

0.231

-

-

-

-

Treatment X TTCI Pre-Score

-

-

-

-

0.28

(0.08 – 0.47)

0.006

0.249

(0.157 – 0.342)

0.008

Observations

282

673

275

673

R2 / adjusted R2

0.343/0.331

 

0.376 / 0.364

 
  1. Full model results predicting student TTCI post-scores using complete-case data (CC) and multiple imputation (MI). Year and treatment are binary variables with reference values in parentheses. MI results are pooled following Rubin (2004). Coefficients significant at p ≤ 0.05 are bolded