|
1. What was the object of this virtual reality (VR) experience?
|
User identified the goal of showing the experience of another species’ visual system
|
19
|
26
|
73%
|
|
2. How did this recognition influence your behavior in VR? What strategies did you employ and why?
|
User identified their intent to experience differences in the visual systems
|
15
|
26
|
58%
|
|
3. What conclusions can you draw about vision among other species (for example, tarsiers) from this VR experience?
|
User explained that visual systems may differ between species
|
24
|
26
|
92%
|
|
4. How did this VR experience differ from a traditional classroom experience?
|
User identified aspect(s) preferable to traditional classroom experience
|
22
|
26
|
85%
|
|
5. Does this change the way you think about adaptation and vision among different species?
|
User expressed advanced understanding of adaptation or visual differences among species
|
15
|
19
|
79%
|
|
6. Did the differences between human and tarsier visions surprise you or match your expectations? Explain.
|
User expressed surprise
|
12
|
18
|
67%
|
|
7. How might the tarsier’s vision be adaptive or helpful in its environment? What are its limitations?
|
User accurately identified ways tarsier vision might be helpful in low-light, visually busy environments
|
15
|
25
|
60%
|
|
8. What benefit(s) might relatively large eyes provide for the tarsier?
|
User accurately identified potential advantages of large eyes
|
22
|
25
|
88%
|
|
9. Which would be more effective in low-light environments: tarsier vision or human vision?
|
User expressed that tarsier vision would be more effective than human vision in low-light environments
|
23
|
25
|
92%
|
