Skip to main content

Table 2 Intervention effects on CINS-B and RaProEvo scores

From: EvoSketch: Simple simulations for learning random and probabilistic processes in evolution, and effects of instructional support on learners’ conceptual knowledge

Effects CINS-B RaProEvo
b SE Cohen’s d b SE Cohen’s d
Fixed
 Intercept − 1.16*** 0.22 0.65 0.10 0.26 0.05
 Simulation 0.14 0.15 0.08 − 0.21 0.15 0.12
 Sim-interpret − 0.01 0.15 0.00 − 0.01 0.15 0.01
 Sim-reflect − 0.02 0.15 0.01 − 0.14 0.15 0.08
 Post – –   − 0.09 0.11 0.05
 Follow-up 0.25 0.16 0.14 − 0.04 0.12 0.02
 CINS-A 0.12*** 0.02 0.06 – –  
 Simulation*post – –   0.04 0.15 0.02
 Sim-interpret*post – –   − 0.04 0.14 0.02
 Sim-reflect*post – –   0.09 0.14 0.05
 Simulation*follow-up − 0.25 0.20 0.06 0.34* 0.15 0.19
 Sim-interpret*follow-up − 0.09 0.19 0.14 0.09 0.15 0.05
 Sim-reflect*follow-up − 0.01 0.20 0.05 0.16 0.15 0.09
  Var SD Var SD
Random
 Participants(intercept) 0.08 0.28 0.30 0.55
 Items(intercept) 0.28 0.52 0.94 0.97
 Class(intercept) 0.02 0.13 0.05 0.23
  1. CINS-A/B pretest/posttest of the conceptual inventory of natural selection, RaProEvo pretest of conceptual knowledge of randomness and probability in evolutionary context
  2. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001
Back to article page

Evolution: Education and Outreach

ISSN: 1936-6434

Contact us