| |
Intervention
|
Totala (n = 244)
|
|---|
|
Text (n = 39)
|
Simulation (n = 66)
|
Sim-interpret (n = 70)
|
Sim-reflect (n = 69)
|
|---|
|
Age
|
15.39 ± 0.55 (15–17)
|
15.62 ± 0.74 (14–18)
|
15.57 ± 0.61 (15–17)
|
15.65 ± 0.66 (15–17)
|
15.58 ± 0.65 (14–18)
|
|
Biology gradeb
|
2.51 ± 0.73 (1–4)
|
2.61 ± 0.91 (1–5)
|
2.77 ± 0.75 (1–5)
|
2.77 ± 0.75 (1–5)
|
2.65 ± 0.85 (1–5)
|
|
C-test
|
13.05 ± 2.88 (8–20)
|
11.58 ± 3.34 (2–18)
|
12.90 ± 2.78 (7–17)
|
12.74 ± 2.77 (7–18)
|
12.52 ± 2.99 (2–20)
|
|
GBCK
|
6.41 ± 2.61 (2–11)
|
5.86 ± 2.31 (0–12)
|
6.23 ± 2.31 (1–12)
|
5.90 ± 2.10 (2–10)
|
6.07 ± 2.30 (0–12)
|
|
RaProEvo
|
10.08 ± 2.51 (3–15)
|
9.29 ± 2.92 (3–18)
|
9.93 ± 2.57 (3–17)
|
9.57 ± 2.78 (3–18)
|
9.68 ± 2.72 (3–18)
|
|
CINS-A
|
3.51 ± 1.68 (0–7)
|
3.45 ± 1.84 (0–10)
|
3.90 ± 1.87 (0–9)
|
3.84 ± 1.78 (1–9)
|
3.70 ± 1.81 (0–10)
|
- GBCK general biological content knowledge, C-test general language proficiency, RaProEvo conceptual knowledge of randomness and probability in evolutionary context, CINS-A conceptual inventory of natural selection
- aThe total sample is smaller than N = 269 because 25 participants were absent during the pretests
- bGrades are measured within the possible range of 1 (good performance) and 6 (poor performance)
