Authors | Item contrast | Dimension of natural selection | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Nehm and Ha (2011) | Scale of change: within or between species changes | Trait gain or loss | Trait gain, as well as within species explanations, had more core ideas than items that asked about trait loss and between species items |
Nettle (2010) | Human vs. non-human animal | Process of evolution of a single trait within a population | Human examples elicited more correct ideas about variation. Fewer misunderstandings with human example |
Opfer et al. (2012) | Animal vs. plant and familiarity of organism | Evolution of a trait | Respondents used more key concepts to explain evolution for familiar and animal contexts than for unfamiliar and plant items. There was no difference in number of cognitive biases demonstrated with either contrast |
White and Yamamoto (2011) | Taxonomic distance | Common ancestry | Negative correlation between taxonomic distance and naive ideas |