Skip to main content

Table 2 Students’ approaches used when tree reading

From: Improving Tree-Thinking One Learnable Skill at a Time

Rationale/criterion

Incoming ideas

Ideas at the end of the course

# Students

% Students

# Students

% Students

Tree interpretation rationales

 Common ancestrya

5

19

21

78

 Monophyletic groupingsa

0

–

8

30

 Implied apomorphies

0

–

5

19

 Rotate branches

0

–

8

30

 Nodal emphasis

4

15

1

4

 Main branch

11

41

2

7

 Unidirectional reading

2

7

1

4

 Proximity of tips

10

37

1

4

 Physical measurements

2

7

0

–

 Ecology of organisms

4

15

0

–

Tree comparison criteria

 Clade comparisona

5

19

21

78

 Physical branching patterns

11

41

2

7

 Branch length comparisons

3

11

1

4

 Patterns in tip proximity

3

11

2

7

 Style of representation

7

26

2

7

  1. Note: totals are equal or more than 100% (27 students) because students could use more than one rationale/criterion when interpreting/comparing phylogenetic representations
  2. aIndicates scientifically accurate understandings